MODFLOW-NWT Flow#
This page groups scientific reading for flow/modflow_nwt.
Use this path when the study needs continuity with legacy structured-grid
MODFLOW-NWT workflows or downstream transport/modpath and
transport/mt3dms compatibility.
What Is Repeated From The Common MODFLOW Part#
flow/modflow_nwt still uses the common MODFLOW-family contract:
hydraulic head is the primary groundwater-flow state;
recharge, wells, storage, imposed heads, and drainage are normalized by the HydroModPy
Flowlayer before backend assembly;stress periods carry the time discretization seen by the backend;
package semantics must be documented before interpreting a result;
comparison against another backend requires checking mesh, vertical representation, forcing aggregation, and boundary-condition mapping.
This repetition is intentional. The MODFLOW-NWT page should be readable without first opening the MODFLOW 6 page.
MODFLOW-NWT Specifics#
Topic |
MODFLOW-NWT interpretation |
|---|---|
Process pair |
|
Backend family |
MODFLOW-NWT. |
Grid support |
Structured |
Package vocabulary |
Legacy MODFLOW package route for flow, recharge, storage, boundary conditions, and outputs. |
Legacy continuity |
Useful for reproducing or comparing with historical studies that were calibrated around MODFLOW-NWT assumptions. |
Downstream transport |
Preferred path for |
Focused Reading#
Typical Use Cases#
Use flow/modflow_nwt when:
the study is structured-grid only;
the target is continuity with an older MODFLOW-NWT workflow;
downstream particle tracking should use MODPATH;
downstream concentration transport should use MT3DMS;
a comparison needs a legacy MODFLOW-family baseline.
Be explicit when:
the same physical case is also run with MODFLOW 6;
MODFLOW 6 uses a different grid topology or XT3D setting;
observations or validation profiles are compared after spatial aggregation;
transport results depend on this upstream flow field.
Surface-Seepage Baseline Example#
For this work, the most useful MODFLOW-NWT example is the committed Nancon transient basin page:
Use it as a legacy baseline because it already places the important evidence in one reading sequence:
hydrographic
referenceversusgeneratedlinework;simulated active-network overlay against
reference;piezometric map;
hydrograph;
water budget.



That is the discipline to preserve when comparing with MODFLOW 6. Copy the scientific reading order, not every backend assumption. MODFLOW-NWT remains structured-grid and legacy-package oriented, while MODFLOW 6 must also document mesh topology, package extraction, and active-network result fields.
For the cross-backend examples and commands, see Worked Examples. For current contracts and non-contracts around simulated active networks, see Status And Limitations.
Scientific Checklist#
Decision point |
What to document |
|---|---|
Grid support |
Structured |
Legacy continuity |
Whether the run is intended to reproduce or compare with older MODFLOW-NWT studies. |
Package envelope |
Which recharge, well, storage, and boundary-condition packages are assembled. |
Comparison target |
Whether the run is compared to MODFLOW 6, Boussinesq, an analytical case, or field observations. |
Transport coupling |
Whether the flow run must feed |
Minimal Plan Shape#
[[simulation.process]]
id = "flow_main"
type = "flow"
solvers = ["modflow_nwt"]
[solver]
backend = { backend = "modflow_nwt" }
Minimal Process Interpretation#
The short TOML shape above means:
one
flowprocess is requested;the selected solver name is
modflow_nwt;HydroModPy resolves common
Flowinputs to the MODFLOW-NWT route;the final scientific interpretation depends on structured support, package choices, stress periods, and downstream legacy transport needs.